twenty-eight there is one, and sometimes twenty-nine. The February 30, however, is usually the subject of jokes. .. when it arrives on 1 March. Just as in Marina di Campo sent once a poor village idiot to buy a "basket of electricity, 32 August, "and he went there, obedient and logical, the morning of September 1. A day of laughter, then, you say, but no. On February 30 it really existed, and three times .
The first was in 1712 , Sweden. It was a complicated issue originated, as usual, by the transition from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar in 1699. At the time, was ahead of the Gregorian Julian ten days It was then decided by the King in person would be recovered one day every four years by eliminating all the leap years: in this way, finally, on 1 March 1740 the two calendars would be tallied. He began to pay the price the poor February 29, 1700 that Sweden (and Finland, which then was part of it) is a non- days. It happened, however, at this point, something very curious. The king, who then was the famous Charles XII was involved in the war against Russia (which ended with the defeat at Poltava on July 8, 1709), then forgot to continue with the frighteningly plan for the calendar , and issue their edicts. 1704 and 1708 were then regularly leap with their twenty-nine February. After noticing the error, Charles XII decided to drop everything and go back to the Julian calendar . The next leap year, 1712, it was decided that in order to recover the ill-fated 29 febbraio 1700, febbraio avesse trenta giorni. Il 30 febbraio 1712, per la cronaca, fu un venerdì.
La seconda e terza volta del 30 febbraio fu invece nella Russia Sovietica , nel 1930 and 1931. On 1 October 1929 the Soviet Union had adopted a revolutionary calendar because it is known that, since 1789, the revolutions (which are, by nature, new age) really like the new timetables. Unlike the French, the Soviet calendar, however, was far less revolutionary ... lexically: the months were always those in their particular form of Russia (February, for example, is said fevral '), and so the names of the days . The salient feature of the Soviet revolutionary calendar was, however, that all months should have thirty days: and so here is also February 30. One might reasonably
chiedersi: ma i giorni che avanzavano, che fine facevano? La Rivoluzione d'Ottobre (che poi, come è noto, era il 7 novembre) non si era spinta fino a modificare i 365 o 366 giorni dell'anno solare. Presto detto. I 5 o sei giorni che avanzavano erano considerati "feste senza mese" . Dopo il 30 gennaio veniva la Festa di Lenin , e poi si passava al 1° febbraio. Dopo il 30 aprile, veniva la Festa del lavoro che però durava due giorni; si passava poi al 1° maggio, che non era affatto festa. Dopo il 7 novembre veniva la Festa dell'industria; infine, dopo il 30 febbraio veniva una festa senza nome negli anni bisestili . E siccome era senza nome, e dopo it was on 1 March, I feel entitled to call safely February 31. Or let them jokes, now!
The Soviet revolutionary calendar was abolished also the week of 7 days: he had just five. It was an anti-religious measures, to eliminate the Christian Sunday as a day of rest. Was provided to all workers then split into five groups (yellow, pink, red, purple and green), and each group had one of the five days of the new cinquimana (pjatidnevka) as a rest. So you also delete non-business days, and the production could go forward without interruption. So I think that nobody would be surprised if I say that, after only two years, the revolutionary calendar was sent into retirement. However it was not even been adopted by all at the official level: the Pravda, for example, the newspaper continued to date with the Gregorian calendar, and numbers of the February 28, 1930 and 1931 were followed by their early March. Starting from 1 December 1931, returned to normal lengths of months, and farewell on February 30.
The revolutionary calendar was however not completely abandoned. Again in 1937 he printed and distributed copies, with its 30 February and its seimana (or šestidnevka ) for five to six days had passed with another uproar when it was put to rest cross the end only in 1940 finally returning to normal week of seven days.
The first was in 1712 , Sweden. It was a complicated issue originated, as usual, by the transition from the Julian to the Gregorian calendar in 1699. At the time, was ahead of the Gregorian Julian ten days It was then decided by the King in person would be recovered one day every four years by eliminating all the leap years: in this way, finally, on 1 March 1740 the two calendars would be tallied. He began to pay the price the poor February 29, 1700 that Sweden (and Finland, which then was part of it) is a non- days. It happened, however, at this point, something very curious. The king, who then was the famous Charles XII was involved in the war against Russia (which ended with the defeat at Poltava on July 8, 1709), then forgot to continue with the frighteningly plan for the calendar , and issue their edicts. 1704 and 1708 were then regularly leap with their twenty-nine February. After noticing the error, Charles XII decided to drop everything and go back to the Julian calendar . The next leap year, 1712, it was decided that in order to recover the ill-fated 29 febbraio 1700, febbraio avesse trenta giorni. Il 30 febbraio 1712, per la cronaca, fu un venerdì.
Il mese di febbraio 1712 in un calendario svedese dell'epoca,
coi tutti i suoi trenta giorni. Alla denominazione latina del mese,
Februarius (ancora oggi, in Svezia, si dice "Februari"), è affiancata
quella tradizionale di Göjemånad -in grafia antica: Göjjemånadt -,
vale a dire: "mese della neve spessa").
coi tutti i suoi trenta giorni. Alla denominazione latina del mese,
Februarius (ancora oggi, in Svezia, si dice "Februari"), è affiancata
quella tradizionale di Göjemånad -in grafia antica: Göjjemånadt -,
vale a dire: "mese della neve spessa").
La seconda e terza volta del 30 febbraio fu invece nella Russia Sovietica , nel 1930 and 1931. On 1 October 1929 the Soviet Union had adopted a revolutionary calendar because it is known that, since 1789, the revolutions (which are, by nature, new age) really like the new timetables. Unlike the French, the Soviet calendar, however, was far less revolutionary ... lexically: the months were always those in their particular form of Russia (February, for example, is said fevral '), and so the names of the days . The salient feature of the Soviet revolutionary calendar was, however, that all months should have thirty days: and so here is also February 30. One might reasonably
chiedersi: ma i giorni che avanzavano, che fine facevano? La Rivoluzione d'Ottobre (che poi, come è noto, era il 7 novembre) non si era spinta fino a modificare i 365 o 366 giorni dell'anno solare. Presto detto. I 5 o sei giorni che avanzavano erano considerati "feste senza mese" . Dopo il 30 gennaio veniva la Festa di Lenin , e poi si passava al 1° febbraio. Dopo il 30 aprile, veniva la Festa del lavoro che però durava due giorni; si passava poi al 1° maggio, che non era affatto festa. Dopo il 7 novembre veniva la Festa dell'industria; infine, dopo il 30 febbraio veniva una festa senza nome negli anni bisestili . E siccome era senza nome, e dopo it was on 1 March, I feel entitled to call safely February 31. Or let them jokes, now!
The Soviet revolutionary calendar was abolished also the week of 7 days: he had just five. It was an anti-religious measures, to eliminate the Christian Sunday as a day of rest. Was provided to all workers then split into five groups (yellow, pink, red, purple and green), and each group had one of the five days of the new cinquimana (pjatidnevka) as a rest. So you also delete non-business days, and the production could go forward without interruption. So I think that nobody would be surprised if I say that, after only two years, the revolutionary calendar was sent into retirement. However it was not even been adopted by all at the official level: the Pravda, for example, the newspaper continued to date with the Gregorian calendar, and numbers of the February 28, 1930 and 1931 were followed by their early March. Starting from 1 December 1931, returned to normal lengths of months, and farewell on February 30.
The revolutionary calendar was however not completely abandoned. Again in 1937 he printed and distributed copies, with its 30 February and its seimana (or šestidnevka ) for five to six days had passed with another uproar when it was put to rest cross the end only in 1940 finally returning to normal week of seven days.
the calendar page of the Revolutionary Soviet
December 12, 1937 (framed by the profiles of Lenin and Stalin). The page above
remember that day belongs to the "21 years of socialist revolution"
and is the "sixth day of seimana. Finally, the important appointment
because it is the "Day of the election of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR."
I think he won the Stalin.
December 12, 1937 (framed by the profiles of Lenin and Stalin). The page above
remember that day belongs to the "21 years of socialist revolution"
and is the "sixth day of seimana. Finally, the important appointment
because it is the "Day of the election of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR."
I think he won the Stalin.
would appear over here. But no. Here you have to go to one of the unforgettable performances character portrait below:
An official document of the White House reports show the transcript of a speech by President George W. Bush the October 11, 2006, in which he recovered without fixing the term of the fiscal year-to February 30 : "This morning my administration released the budget numbers for fiscal 2006. These budget numbers are not just Estimates , These Are the actual results for the fiscal year ended February the 30th That. " The scribe, as can be seen, felt compelled to add a [sic]. But there is also a star back in Footers, where you specify the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30. That day, somewhere, will surely be followed by a September 31!
An official document of the White House reports show the transcript of a speech by President George W. Bush the October 11, 2006, in which he recovered without fixing the term of the fiscal year-to February 30 : "This morning my administration released the budget numbers for fiscal 2006. These budget numbers are not just Estimates , These Are the actual results for the fiscal year ended February the 30th That. " The scribe, as can be seen, felt compelled to add a [sic]. But there is also a star back in Footers, where you specify the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30. That day, somewhere, will surely be followed by a September 31!
0 comments:
Post a Comment